About
For most recent posts click here
SO this is a blog….For the Investment Banking Industry professionals.
Right now it is going to be pretty simple, but we will evolve it over time.
The idea is to have some useful resources and information for professionals in our industry.
Some Networking too…..
I get people asking me the same old questions all the time so I’m going to start posting the answers here…make it a little easier on myself and the information a little more accessible for everyone else.
If you would like to join this website as a contributor feel free to do so. If I have help it will grow a little faster.
But I guess there will be a few rules on who can join as a contributor as I have always been an anti-scam, anti-”pump-and-dump”, anti-amateur, anti-”self-interest”, anti-short-term-interest-only and probably a few other anti-something-or-anothers that I haven’t even discovered yet.
The idea is for investment banking to help grow, foster and develop new companies, new ideas, new inventions and thus contribute to society - not just take from society.
So let’s just make this the rule to begin with. If you don’t agree with the above statements, don’t bother to try to contribute to this site as we definitely won’t get along.
Stan Medley
I have a question or it’s more like a doubt. I own a private company and we’ve been looking to go public. Everyone tells me that a merger with a trading shell is the way to go (on the pinks and we dont mind staying there for a while). Everyone execpt my SEC lawyer. My lawyer is telling me that the days of the reverse merger are over even if they are reporting. He’s told me that the SEC is blocking them. I asked about a non-trading reporting shell and he said no way. However I keep seeing deals get done and Just this year I saw a company go public with a non-trading reporting shell. So whats the deal here? Is he just trying to get me to do a long registration that will cost us a lot more in fees or are these latest deals going through by some other means?